- Open Access
Prevalence and associated risk factors for Salmonella enterica contamination of cow milk and cottage cheese in Ethiopia
International Journal of Food Contamination volume 10, Article number: 2 (2023)
Animal sourced foods, such as dairy products, are common sources of Salmonella enterica, a foodborne pathogen of increasing global concern, particularly in developing countries. In Ethiopia, most data on the prevalence of Salmonella in dairy products is highly varied and limited to a specific region or district. Furthermore, there is no data available on the risk factors for Salmonella contamination of cow milk and cottage cheese in Ethiopia. This study was therefore conducted to determine the presence of Salmonella throughout the Ethiopian dairy value chain and to identify risk factors for contamination with Salmonella. The study was carried out in three regions of Ethiopia, including Oromia, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples, and Amhara during a dry season. A total 912 samples were collected from milk producers, collectors, processors, and retailers. Samples were tested for Salmonella using the ISO 6579-1: 2008 method, followed by PCR confirmation. Concurrent with sample collection, a survey was administered to study participants to identify risk factors associated with Salmonella contamination. Salmonella contamination was highest in raw milk samples at the production (19.7%) and at milk collection (21.3%) levels. No significant difference in the prevalence of Salmonella contamination among regions was detected (p > 0.05). Regional differences were apparent for cottage cheese, with the highest prevalence being in Oromia (6.3%). Identified risk factors included the temperature of water used for cow udder washing, the practice of mixing milk lots, the type of milk container, use of refrigeration, and milk filtration. These identified factors can be leveraged to develop targeted intervention strategies aimed at reducing the prevalence of Salmonella in milk and cottage cheese in Ethiopia.
Foodborne disease is a global issue, with approximately 600 million cases of illness and 420,000 deaths associated with foodborne pathogens on an annual basis (Havelaar et al., 2015). In low- and middle-income countries, the problem is often more severe and less documented compared to high-income countries (Wabeto et al.,2017). However, anecdotal data indicate that this is due to poor food handling and sanitation practices, inadequate food safety laws, weak regulatory systems, lack of financial resources, and poor awareness of proper food handling practices (Asfaw Geresu et al., 2021). Among the common bacterial foodborne pathogens, non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica (Salmonella) is considered a pathogen of high public health concern (Chen et al., 2013; Henry et al., 2017).
Although many countries have milk safety regulations and surveillance systems for monitoring of foodborne pathogens to ensure food safety, such surveillance of milk and milk products is not conducted on a routine basis in Ethiopia. As a result, there is limited information available on the microbial safety of milk (Bereda et al., 2014; Birke and Zewide, 2019). This is particularly true in the central highlands of Ethiopia, where milk production plays a significant role in the diets and economies of communities (Tegegne et al., 2013; Gizaw et al., 2016). Previous studies on the prevalence of Salmonella in dairy products in Ethiopia have reported a range of prevalence, between 6.5% to 20% in milk, and between 0% to 3.1% in cottage cheese (Tesfaw et al., 2013; Tadesse and Dabassa, 2012; Ejo et al., 2016; Beyene et al., 2016;). These studies have been conducted in different regions of Ethiopia and samples have been collected at different points in the dairy value chain. However, to date, no study has systematically investigated differences in the prevalence of Salmonella among major milk producing regions in Ethiopia, nor among different points in the value chain, from production, collection, processing, to retail.
In addition to prevalence, understanding the factors that increase the odds of Salmonella contamination of milk and cottage cheese is critically important for the development of effective mitigation strategies in Ethiopia. Past studies that have assessed the hygiene of milk containers, the environments in which milking takes place, the bedding in cow barns, the quality of the feed, and the hygiene of people engaged in milking have already identified inadequate practices as likely contributors to poor milk quality/safety (Amanuel and Ulfina, 2018; Adugna and Eshetu, 2021). However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has identified risk factors associated with Salmonella contamination of milk and milk products in Ethiopia (Keba et al., 2020).
This study aimed to fill the above-outlined gaps in the knowledge by determining the prevalence of Salmonella in milk and cottage cheese along milk and cottage cheese value chains in three major milk-producing regions of Ethiopia, including Oromia, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP), and Amhara. Furthermore, it aimed to identify risk factors for contamination with Salmonella that could inform the development of interventions.
Study areas and study design
This study was conducted in three regions of Ethiopia (Fig. 1) based on the dairy production potential of the country (CSA, 2019). According to Central Statistical Agency (CSA) data (2010), not all regions have the same capacity to produce cow milk. The estimated milk production potential in Oromia is 52%, in SNNP 23%, in Amhara 20%, and in Tigray 5% of Ethiopia’s total milk production volume. This information was used to estimate the minimum sample size for each region, which was determined to be 480 in Oromia, 240 in SNNP, and 194 in Amhara. Samples were ultimately not collected in Tigray due to safety concerns related to a political unrest.
A cross-sectional study was conducted during a dry season between December 2020 and May 2021 to determine the prevalence of Salmonella along the milk and cottage cheese value chains in each region. After the sites selection, product-based strata were created based on the milk production potential and availability of participants for each level in a value chain. A list of milk producers, collectors, processors, and retailors was obtained from each study area representatives (i.e., extension agents). Participants were randomly selected for inclusion in the study from the list of potential participants.
Approximately 250 mL of raw and pasteurized milk were aseptically collected and placed in a sterile polyethylene bottle and 500 g of cottage cheese samples were collected in a sterile polyethylene zip-lock bag and stored in a portable cooler at 4 °C. Samples were transported in a cooler to the National Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Microbial Biotechnology Research Laboratory, and stored at 4 °C until analyzed. Samples were analyzed within 12 hours after delivery to the laboratory.
Salmonella enrichment, isolation, and confirmation
Salmonella enrichment and isolation were completed according to ISO 6579-1: (ISO 2017; Mooijman, 2018) and putative Salmonella isolates were PCR-confirmed (Andrews et al., 2018). Briefly, 25 mL of milk or 25 g of cottage cheese were transferred to 225 ml of sterile buffered peptone water (Oxoid, CM 0509), homogenized in a stomacher bag, and incubated at 35 °C for 18 hours. After incubation, 0.1 mL and 1 mL of a primary enrichment was aseptically inoculated into 10 mL of sterile Rappaport Vassiliadis (RV) broth (HiMedia) and Muller Kaufmann Tetrathionate (MKTTn) broth (HiMedia), respectively. An inoculated RV broth was incubated at 41 °C for 24 h and inoculated MKTTn broth was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. A 10 μl loopful of cultured RV and MKTTn broths was streaked onto both Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) agar (HiMedia) and Hektoen Enteric (HE) agar (HiMedia). Inoculated plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. Typical pink or red colonies with or without black centers on XLD and blue-green to blue colonies with or without black centers on HE agar were sub-cultured on BHI agar (BBL) and incubated at 35° ± 2.0 °C for 24 ± 2.0 h for molecular confirmation.
Salmonella isolates were confirmed utilizing PCR targeting the invA gene (Galán and Curtiss 3rd., 1991). The extraction of DNA was performed by thermal cell lysis at 95–100 °C for 10 min (El-baz et al., 2017; Reischl and Wittwer, 2001). Extracted DNA was used as a template for the amplification of highly conserved region of invA gene using primers Salm3 (5′-GCTGCGCGCGAACGGCGAAG-3′) and Salm4 (5′-TCCCGGCAGAGTTCCCATT-3′) that amplify a 389 bp fragment of the conserved invA gene sequence of Salmonella.
PCR included initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 95 °C for 90 s, annealing at 60 °C for 60 s, and extension at 72 °C for 90 s), ending with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min, using a BioRad T100 thermocycler. PCR amplicons were confirmed with gel electrophoresis using a 1.5% w/v agarose gel. Gels were examined using an UV transillumination system (UVP BioDoc-It Imaging Systems, Analytik Jena) (Shanmugasamy et al.,2011; El-baz et al.,2017).
Survey data collection
Data on milk and cottage cheese production, storage, transportation, and packaging operations was collected by a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Addis-Ababa University (CNS-IRB 42/2019). The survey was administered using the Kobo toolbox. Aside from providing a questionnaire, a direct examination of general cleanliness, sanitary practices, and pasteurized milk and cottage cheese packaging materials were conducted and recorded. The survey was administered at the time of milk or cottage cheese sample collection for laboratory analyses for Salmonella.
Binomial response variable (i.e., presence or absence of Salmonella) was considered as an outcome variable and the region, product type, points in the value chain were considered as explanatory (independent) variables. As the outcome was dichotomous, a logistic regression model was used to analyze the association of the outcome variable with the explanatory variables. Odds ratio (OR) was used to measure the degree of association among and within the explanatory variables. In all analyses, alpha was set to 0.05. For all the analysis, Stata version 16 software was used using the following formula:
Where P^ is the expected probability that the outcome (Salmonella contamination) is positive; X1 through Xp are distinct independent variables, and b0 through bp are the regression coefficients.
Prevalence of Salmonella in raw milk, pasteurized milk, and cottage cheese
Table 1 presents the prevalence of Salmonella between pasteurized and raw milk in each study regions. Salmonella prevalence differed significantly between raw and pasteurized milk only in the Oromia region (p = 0.015). Furthermore, the prevalence of Salmonella in raw milk was highest in Oromia (21.4%), followed by SNNPs (19.8%), and Amhara (14.1%); however, these differences were not statistically significant (Table 2). Similarly, the prevalence of Salmonella in samples from pasteurized milk was highest in Oromia (12.5%), followed by SNNP (11.5%), and Amhara (9%), but the differences were not statistically significant (Table 3).
The prevalence of Salmonella in cottage cheese was 6.3% in samples collected from producers, as well as from retailers in Oromia. No Salmonella was detected in cottage cheese samples collected from retailers in Amhara nor in SNNP (Table 4). The differences in prevalence between producers and retailers within each region were not statistically significant, as shown in Table 4. The overall total prevalence among the raw and pasteurized milk was about 15.6% (114/732) throughout the study areas of the country. It was higher in the raw milk type with 19.7% (72/366) and lower in pasteurized milk with 11.5% (42/366), as shown in Table 5.
When comparing Salmonella prevalence along the value chain, milk samples taken from collectors had the highest prevalence of Salmonella (21.3%; p = 0.01), whereas samples collected from retailers had the lowest prevalence (9.3%). Prevalence of Salmonella in samples collected from producers was lower (18.1%) compared to those collected from collectors, but higher compared to those collected from processors (13.7%; p = 0.01) (Table 5). The overall prevalence of Salmonella was highest in Oromia (17.2%), followed by SNNP (15.6%), and Amhara (11.5%); however, the differences in the prevalence among regions were not statistically significant (p = 0.26) (Table 5).
Risk factors associated with Salmonella contamination of milk and cottage cheese
It is important to note that this assessment has evaluated more variables than presented in Table 6, however, many of these tested variables were statistically insignificantly. Therefore, only variables with statistical significance are summarized in Table 6 to ease the readability and data interpretation.
Risk factors for milk contamination at the production level
Among 184 surveyed milk producers, 32.6% lived in urban and 67.4% in peri-urban areas. The gender ratio among surveyed participants was nearly equal (52.2% men and 47.8% women). Among surveyed farmers, the majority had only informal education (49.6%), followed by elementary school (52.8%), high school (40.7%), preparatory (13.7%), and a college degree (30.3%). Surveyed participants were asked about hygiene practices carried out at the farm. Survey results showed that washing udders of cows before milking was performed by 94% of farmers. Sixty-seven percent of the surveyed farmers also dried washed udders utilizing pieces of clothes. The above outlined variables were not significantly associated with the prevalence of Salmonella (p > 0.05).
Based on the survey and microbial data, a lower prevalence of Salmonella was observed in raw milk collected from untrained study participants of milk hygienic handling-related training, while milk collected from trained study participants had a higher prevalence of Salmonella (25.2%; p = 0.002). Milk collected from individuals that used cold water for cleaning cow udder was more frequently contaminated with Salmonella (25.8%) compared to milk collected from individuals utilizing hot water (13.1%; p = 0.03). All milk samples collected from producers that mixed milk collected in the morning and evening were contaminated with Salmonella, whereas Salmonella was detected in just 16.7% of samples from participants that did not mix morning and evening milk batches (p = 0.029). Finally, Salmonella prevalence in milk collected from participants that stored milk in aluminum cans was higher (46.1%) compared to those that stored milk in plastic cans (15.2%) and mazzi cans (14.3%; p = 0.018).
Our data indicate that training related to milk handling, water temperature used for udder washing, mixing of evening and morning batches of milk, and types of milk handling containers all had a significant effect on the prevalence of Salmonella in milk (Table 6). Based on study participants’ responses, most producers had access to training related to milk production and hygienic milk handling (e.g., housing, feeding, milking, and health issues). Surprisingly, data analysis indicated a higher prevalence of Salmonella in products collected from respondents that attended a training compared to respondents that did not (p = 0.002). It is, however, important to note that this study did not evaluate the curriculum nor the effectiveness of these trainings, making it difficult to make inferences about this counter-intuitive finding. Further research on this topic could help to reveal the factors that may be contributing to this outcome. Finally, the practice of mixing milk from evening and morning milking showed a greater association with Salmonella contamination than in those who do not (p = 0.029; Table 6).
Risk factors for milk contamination at the collection level
A total of 58 milk collectors participated in the survey, with 79.3% of them living in urban areas. Among surveyed individuals, there were 51.7% women and 48.3% men. Approximately a quarter of participants (24.2%) had primary school education, 36.2% completed high school and had a diploma/college degree, and 8.6% completed preparatory school. One third of the respondents had 1–2 or 2–5 years of experience collecting milk. According to the survey, 65.9% of study participants collected milk by foot, while 20.3% used a three-wheel drive and 13.8% used a four-wheel drive. In terms of cooling systems used during transportation of milk to collection centers, 63.8% of surveyed individuals indicated that they had a cooling system (e.g., refrigerator). At the collection center, almost all (91.4%) of surveyed participants indicated that they store milk containers on a concrete floor, and 96.5% used tap water to clean the containers. The above outlined factors were not statistically significantly associated with Salmonella prevalence (p > 0.05).
Refrigeration system, milk containers, and milk filtration used by collectors were significantly and positively associated with Salmonella contamination (Table 6). In contrast, Salmonella prevalence was significantly lower in milk samples collected from collectors that use refrigerated bulk tanks (5%) but was higher for users of + 4 °C refrigerators (30.4%) and for deep freezer (− 20 °C) users (16.7%) (p = 0.039). The prevalence of Salmonella was significantly higher in milk samples collected from collectors that used both plastic containers and aluminum cans compared to those that used mazzi can (p = 0.013). Lastly, milk filtration was associated with increased prevalence of Salmonella. Specifically, milk collected from collectors that filtered milk was two times more likely to be contaminated with Salmonella compared to milk collected from collectors that did not filter milk (p = 0.031).
Risk factors for milk contamination at processing level
A total of 12 milk processors were surveyed in this study. Seventy-five percent of the participants lived in urban areas and 92% were men. Nearly half of them (42%) had more than 10 years of experience with milk processing, 17% had less than a year of experience, 16% had 5–10 years of experience and 25% had 2–5 years of experience. Almost all participating processors (92%) have had had basic food safety training. Most participants (67%) cleaned milk containers twice a day, while the rest did so once a day. The majority of respondents (67%) used tap water for cleaning milking equipment, while the rest used groundwater. Twenty-five percent of the respondents used a piece of cloth to sieve the milk, while 67% of them used microfiltration and 8% used a metal sieve. Almost all (92%) of the respondents reported having cold storage for pasteurized milk. None of these variables had a significant effect on the prevalence of Salmonella.
Factors associated with an increased Salmonella prevalence at the milk processing level included sanitation and inspection procedures. For example, it revealed the prevalence had doubled in the evaluators of tests that include: alcohol, organoleptic, Lacto scan, and microbiology compared with alcohol, organoleptic and microbiological test analyzers (excluding Lacto scan in the latter). It was almost the same as only alcohol and organoleptic test assessors (p = 0.006). It was important to point out that not all processors used the same factors. Consequently, these processors were classified based on their various testing methodologies, and the results were analyzed accordingly.
Risk factors for milk contamination at the retail level
A total of 181 milk retailers from Oromia, Amhara, and SNNP were interviewed. Fifty-three percent of the respondents were male. The assessment of the educational background revealed that 3.3%, 24.3%, 30.4%, 8.3%, and 33.7% had informal, primary school, high school, preparatory, and college diploma/degree, respectively. The majority of the respondents (79.6%) had less than 5 years of experience in retail. Almost none of the respondents had access to hygienic/safe milk handling training.
Over half of surveyed participants (51.4%) acquired milk from whole sellers, 45.8% from factories, and 2.8% at the factories gate. Most surveyed retailers (78.3%) used trucks with cooling systems to deliver milk to the retailing station, whereas around 21.7% used four-wheel vehicles without a cooling system. A temperature-controlled cooling system was used by 49.7% of retailers. The majority of retailers (70.7%) had a separate refrigerator for milk storage until sale. None of the above-listed factors were statistically significantly associated with Salmonella contamination.
Risk factors for contamination of cottage cheese at the production level
A total of 89 cottage cheese producers were surveyed and 56% of them were from the peri-urban area. Ninety-two percent were women. Around one-third of the respondents were illiterate and 30% had primary school education, 27% had high school education, and 5% had preparatory school education and had diplomas/degrees. The respondents’ experience in years was less than a year, 1–2 years, 2–5 years, 5–10 years, and more than 10 years for 7%, 20%, 32%, 15%, and 27% of respondents, respectively.
Almost all of the surveyed cottage cheese producers (92%) received training on proper handling and storage of cottage cheese. The cottage cheese was placed in whey by 60% of the respondents, while 34% used a refrigerator, and 7% used a vessel of cold water. The majority (54%) walked to the market, 21% used public transportation, 18% drove a three-wheel drive, and 7% rode in an animal-drawn cart. For 36% of them, the time it took to get to the marketplace was less than 30 minutes, for 43% it took 30 minutes to 1 h and for 21% it took more than 1 h. Most respondents (97%) cleaned the cottage cheese containers regularly. The most frequent container washers (77%) used water and detergents, while the rest used different herbs. None of the factors outlined above were statistically significantly associated with contamination of cottage cheese with Salmonella.
Risk factors for cottage cheese contamination at the retailer level
The production system was the only variable in the value chain of cottage cheese retailers in this study that revealed statistical significance. Milk from peri-urban residents were 10 times more exposed to Salmonella than urban dwellers (85.6%; p = 0.009). Females comprised almost four-fifths of the respondents, while males were 20%. In informal, primary school, high school, preparatory, and diploma/degree, the educational background evaluation indicated 2.2%, 24.5%, 22.2%, 4.4%, and 46.7%, respectively. The respondents’ experience in years was less than a year, 1–2 years, 2–5 years, 5–10 years, and more than 10 years accounted for 17.8%, 18.9%, 42.2%, 8.9%, and 12.2% of the respondents, respectively.
The majority (77.8%) of individuals interviewed in this value chain did not train on how to handle and store cottage cheeses properly. A quarter of them (26.7%) walked to the market, 20% used public transportation, 15.6% drove three-wheel drives, 5.5% used four-wheels, 28.9% used refrigerated vehicles, and 6.7% traveled in animal-drawn carts. Over half of them (52.2%) kept cottage cheese in a separate refrigerator until sold. The majority (71.1%) had backup generators, which they used when the power went out.
Our findings demonstrated that though the prevalence of Salmonella contamination was highest in raw milk samples and milk samples collected from milk collectors, Salmonella contamination was detected in all tested sample types collected at all value chain points, and in all studied regions.
From a region perspective, the prevalence of Salmonella in samples collected from Oromia (14.8%) is consistent with previously published data by Beyene et al. (2016), Asfaw Ali et al. (2020), Abunna et al. (2017), and Tadesse and Dabassa (2012) potentially indicating that efforts on milk safety should be focused on milk production in this region. However, some reports demonstrated a much lower prevalence. For instance, the work of Dadi et al. (2020), Hailu et al. (2015), Liyuwork et al. (2013), Reta et al. (2016), Ejo et al. (2016), and Tadesse and Gebremedhin (2015), for Salmonella prevalence in Oromia region (Sebeta), Amhara region (Gondar), Addis Ababa, Somali region, and Amhara region (Gondar), respectively, were lower as compared to the current work result. Therefore, further surveillance may be necessary.
Our study indicated that the prevalence of Salmonella contamination was higher in raw milk, as compared to pasteurized milk. In contrast, the prevalence reported here was higher compared to past studies of Liyuwork et al. (2013) and Ejo et al. (2016), who recorded 2.1% and 0% Salmonella in pasteurized milk in Ethiopia, respectively. However, according to a report by CDC (1984), there was a 15% prevalence in this value chain, which was consistent with the current study. This high occurrence may be attributed to the samples’ insufficient pasteurization and post-pasteurization contamination (CDC, 2019). The higher prevalence of Salmonella in pasteurized milk suggests the possibility that some milk processors are carrying out pasteurization at temperatures that are lower than those recommended for effective pasteurization of milk or are pasteurizing milk for a shorter than recommended time. If pasteurization is effective, it will inactivate Salmonella; hence Salmonella will not be able to grow unless a post-pasteurization contamination has occurred and the milk storage conditions (e.g., temperature) supported its growth.
There are a limited number of reports on the prevalence of Salmonella in cottage cheese in Ethiopia. In 2013, Liyuwork and his colleagues reported 3.1% prevalence of Salmonella in tested cottage cheese samples collected in Ethiopia, which is consistent with our findings. The boiling process causes Salmonella to be more prevalent in raw milk than in cottage cheese. As a result, the bacteria cannot tolerate the heat and dies. Furthermore, the change in the pH and consistency of milk also alters the conducive environment that the bacteria used to live (Coelho et al., 2022).
Analysis of risk factors associated with Salmonella contamination of milk and cottage cheese has shown the critical points in which intervention may be most effective. An interesting finding was that a higher prevalence found among the milk producers, those who received training related to milk handling than those who did not. However, we do not know much about those trainings and there may be a need to evaluate the effectiveness of trainings in the future, suggesting more efforts to be made. However, without a fuller understanding of the curriculum in these trainings, this is simply a speculation. Another point could simply be that trainees are not applying—or cannot apply (due to limited resources)—the practices that were recommended in trainings. Therefore, future trainings should consider this data and implement methods to ensure adoption of training information, which could include pre- and post-assessments, follow up trainings, assessments of competencies, etc.
It is widely considered that hot water is preferred over cold water for sanitation, as it not only cleans but also kills bacteria. Oddly, these were not the findings of this study. In hot water, chemical processes that are important for cleaning happen more quickly because the heat helps destroy bacteria. The molecules of water move more quickly and bounce off one another more when it is heated. As a result, there is more room between the molecules for dissolved solvents to fill. Hot water may therefore dissolve a lot more substance than cold water (Al-Hubaety et al., 2013).
Additionally, this study found that containers in which milk is stored, or transported, should be kept clean: otherwise, they may impact the safety of the milk. In this study we found that aluminum can resulted in lower Salmonella contamination. This could be due to the ease of sanitation of such containers; however, this was not evaluated in this study.
Additionally, this data shows that refrigeration practices should be increased significantly, as it can help reduce microbial growth and allow for milk to be kept for a longer time. This information can guide specific point at which policymakers must intervene to ensure the safety of milk and its products. Otherwise, the severity of Salmonella contamination may continue to endanger humans and livestock and cause significant economic damage.
In this study, the practice of filtering milk by collectors upon reception resulted in an inverse association with Salmonella contamination. Previous studies have indicated that filtering can increase milk quality and microfiltration can remove microorganisms (Elwell and Barbano, 2006; Garcia et al., 2013), however, filtering can also introduce contaminants present on the material used for filtration. Furthermore, the pore size of the filter may allow microorganisms to pass through.
In this study, factors such as training on milk quality and safety, the use of hot or cold water to clean the udder of the animals, the practice of mixing the morning and night milk, the storage of milk containers, and the refrigeration of milk were significantly associated with Salmonella contamination. The conclusion from this point is that dairy farmers should not only focus on the money they earn for the production of milk but also protect the health of the community and themselves. Otherwise, salmonellosis will indeed take root and affect the health and economy of the community, reducing production and productivity.
Generally, the results from this study indicate the safety of milk and other dairy product based upon the prevalence of Salmonella in all studied regions was poor. Milk composition, sanitation, and sanitary conditions of personnel working with milk and its products, with high regard for human health, might be the factors to contribute to the contamination of milk with Salmonella.
In conclusion, to improve the quality and safety of raw milk and milk products in Ethiopia, effective training and raising awareness among stakeholders at each level of the supply chain (producers, collectors, processing factories, and retailers/supermarkets) are necessary. Furthermore, public education regarding the hygienic practices, safety, and risks of consumption of raw or dairy products are important lines of defense against Salmonella infection and other food-borne pathogens transmitted through dairy products in the region.
Availability of data and materials
Abunna F, Ashenafi D, Beyene T, Ayana D, Mamo B, Duguma R (2017) Isolation, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Salmonella isolates from dairy farms in and around Modjo town, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Vet J 21(2):92–108
Adugna C, Eshetu M (2021) Hygienic practice, microbial quality and physco-chemical properties of milk collected from farmers and market chains in eastern Wollega zone of Sibu sire districts, Ethiopia. J Agric Sc Food Technol 7(1):125–132
AL-Hubaety AK, Awad R, THanon RI, Ez-Aldin FA, Coll (2013) Udder preparation and its effect on udder cleanliness and milk quality. Al-Qadisiyah J Vet Med Sci 12(1):128–138
Andrews WH, Wang H, Jacobson A, Hammack T (2018) Food and Drug Administration. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). Chapter 5: Salmonella. https://www.fda.gov/food/foodscienceresearch/laboratorymethods/ucm070149.htm
Asfaw Ali D, Tadesse B, Ebabu A (2020) Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella isolated from Caecal contents of exotic chicken in Debre Zeit and Modjo, Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol 2020:1–6
Asfaw Geresu M, Assefa Wayuo B, Mamo Kassa G (2021) Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Salmonella isolates from animal origin food items in selected areas of Arsi zone, Southeastern Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol 2021:6633522
Bekuma A, Galmessa U (2018) Review on hygienic Milk products practice and occurrence of mastitis in Cow’s Milk. Agri Res Tech 18(2):1–11
Bereda A, Yesuf Kurtu M, Yilma Z (2014) Handling, processing and utilization of Milk and Milk products in Ethiopia: a review. World J Dairy Food Sci 9(2):105–112
Beyene T, Yibeltie H, Chebo B, Abunna F, Beyi AF, Mammo B et al (2016) Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Salmonella isolated from selected dairy farms, abattoir, and humans at Asella town. J Vet Sci Technol 7(3):320
Birke W, Zawide F (2019) Transforming research results in food safety to community actions: A call for action to advance food safety in Ethiopia. Environ Ecol Res 7:153–170
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (1984) Salmonellosis from inadequately pasteurized milk–Kentucky. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 33(36):505–506
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) (2019) Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, Atlanta
Chen HM, Wang Y, Su LH, Chiu CH (2013) Nontyphoid salmonella infection: microbiology, clinical features, and antimicrobial therapy. Pediatr Neonatol 54(3):147–152
Coelho MC, Malcata FX, Silva CC (2022) Lactic acid Bacteria in raw-Milk cheeses: from starter cultures to probiotic functions. Foods 11(15):2276
CSA (2019) Agricultural sample survey 2018/19 report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Stat Bull 588, Addis Ababa
CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2010) Livestock and livestock characteristics. Agricultural sample survey. Stat Bull 2(468):107
Dadi S, Lakew M, Seid M, Koran T, O. A. (2020) Isolation of Salmonella and E. coli (E. coli O157:H7) and its Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern from Bulk Tank Raw Milk in Sebeta Town, Ethiopia. HSOA J Animal Res Vet Sci 4(21):1–7
Ejo M, Garedew L, Alebachew Z, Worku W (2016) Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from animal-origin food items in Gondar, Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int 2016: Article ID 4290506
El-baz AH, El-sherbini M, Abdelkhalek A, Al-ashmawy MA (2017) Prevalence and molecular characterization of Salmonella serovars in milk and cheese in Mansoura city, Egypt. J Adv Vet Anim Res 4(1):45–51
Elwell MW, Barbano DM (2006) Use of microfiltration to improve fluid milk quality. J Dairy Sci 89:E20–E30
Galán JE, Curtiss R 3rd. (1991) Distribution of the invA, −B, −C, and -D genes of Salmonella typhimurium among other Salmonella serovars: invA mutants of Salmonella typhi are deficient for entry into mammalian cells. Infect Immun 59(9):2901–2908. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.59.9.2901-2908.1991 PMID: 1879916; PMCID: PMC258111
García LF, Blanco SÁ, Rodríguez FR (2013) Microfiltration applied to dairy streams: removal of bacteria. J Sci Food Agric 93:187–196
Gizaw S, Abera M, Muluye M, Hoekstra D, Gebremedhin B, Tegegne A (2016) Smallholder dairy farming systems in the highlands of Ethiopia: system-specific constraints and intervention options. LIVES Working Paper
Hailu D, Gelaw A, Molla W, Garedew L, Cole L, Johnson R (2015) Prevalence and antibiotic resistance patterns of Salmonella isolates from lactating cows and in-contact humans in dairy farms, Northwest Ethiopia. J Environ Occup Sci 4(4)
Havelaar AH, Kirk MD, Torgerson PR, Gibb HJ, Hald T, Lake RJ, Praet N, Bellinger DC, de Silva NR, Gargouri N, Speybroeck N, Cawthorne A, Mathers C, Stein C, Angulo FJ, Devleesschauwer B, World Health Organization Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference, G (2015) World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med 12(12):e1001923
Henry MK, Tongue SC, Evans J, Webster C, Mc KI, Morgan M, Willett A, Reeves A, Humphry RW, Gally DL, Gunn GJ, Chase-Topping ME (2017) British Escherichia coli O157 in cattle study (BECS): to determine the prevalence of E. coli O157 in herds with cattle destined for the food chain. Epidemiol Infect 145(15):3168–3179
Keba A, Rolon ML, Tamene A, Dessie K, Vipham J, Kovac J et al (2020) Review of the prevalence of foodborne pathogens in milk and dairy products in Ethiopia. Int Dairy J 104762
ISO (2017) EN ISO 6579-1 Microbiology of the food chain – Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella – Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Liyuwork T, Biruhalem T, Sefinew A, Haile A, Zufan S, Haileleul N (2013) Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Salmonella isolated from dairy products in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res 7(43):5046–5050
Mooijman KA (2018) The new ISO 6579-1: A real horizontal standard for detection of Salmonella. Food Microbiol 71:2–7
Reischl U, Wittwer C (2001) Rapid cycle real-time PCR: methods and applications. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–8
Reta MA, Bereda TW, Alemu AN (2016) Bacterial contamination of raw cow’s milk consumed at Jigjiga City of Somali regional state, eastern Ethiopia. Int J Food Contamination 3(1):1–9
Shanmugasamy M, Velayutham T, Rajeswar J (2011) Inv a gene-specific PCR for detection of salmonella from broilers. Vet World 4(12):562–564
Tadesse G, Gebremedhin EZ (2015) Prevalence of Salmonella in raw animal products in Ethiopia: a meta-analysis. BMC Res Notes 8(1):1–8
Tadesse T, Dabassa A (2012) Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from raw milk samples collected from Kersa District, Jimma zone, Southwest Ethiopia. J Med Sci(Faisalabad) 12:224–228
Tegegne A, Gebremedhin B, Hoekstra D, Belay B, Mekasha Y (2013) Smallholder dairy production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: IPMS experiences and opportunities for market-oriented development. In: IPMS (improving productivity and market success) of Ethiopian farmers project working paper 31, vol 31. ILRI, Nairobi, p 78
Tesfaw L, Taye B, Alemu S, Alemayehu H, Sisay, Z, Negussie H (2013) Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Salmonella isolates from dairy products in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res 7;5046:e5050
Wabeto W, Abraham Y, Anjulo AA (2017) Detection and identification of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella in raw beef at Wolaita Sodo municipal abattoir, Southern Ethiopia. J Health Popul Nutr 36(1):52
We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the people and agricultural development agents (DEAs) of all the sites and regions, who took the time to answer the survey questionnaire. Finally, we want to thank Abdi Keba, Haimanot Tilahun, Sintayehu Kebede, and Kebede Gizachew for their help with the Salmonella prevalence analysis in the lab.
This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office of the UK [Grant Number INV-00845] awarded to Addis Ababa University. The work of JK was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Appropriations under Project PEN04646 and Accession 1015787.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved, and ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University (CNS-IRB 42/2019).
Consent for publication
All authors consent to publication.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Bedassa, A., Nahusenay, H., Asefa, Z. et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors for Salmonella enterica contamination of cow milk and cottage cheese in Ethiopia. FoodContamination 10, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-023-00101-3
- Cottage cheese
- Raw milk
- Pasteurized milk
- Risk factors
- Salmonella enterica